You've done two projects with Ryan Murphy now. I suspect there will be more.
Why, again, did we need to see the Dahmer story? We all lived it when it happened. We lived it again when Jeremy Renner took on the role. And again and again in various and sundry TV exposes. What is the purpose of the "Monsters" TV series, yet another franchise from Ryan Murphy? I did not watch the Dahmer entry either. Nor, Molly, was I even aware that you were in it. The purpose? Not having nor planning to see any episodes of this televised endeavour should I really be offering my opinion? Well, it hasn't stopped me before, so here goes!
It seems to me that "Monsters" apart from being a ratings, thus moolah juggernaut, is merely an excursion into the desecration of the flesh and ultimately the spirit. The mind is merely an afterthought. Watching Jeff and Lyle and Eric recommit their crimes for what can only be our entertainment seems to play to our basest instincts. Are we tuning in to get to the bottom of human nature; how it can be twisted and go awry? Or are we tuning in to see what a shotgun can do to a human face or how a drill bit can be used to hollow out a skull? Gnarly!
I'm not going to go into a big thing here aboute exploitation, ethics, morality, greed--any of that. And full disclosure, I loved FEUD: Bette and Joan.
But this is a memo to Molly.
Molly, you recently mentioned, I think it was on Seth Meyers "talker," that you want to further expand your acting endeavours by playing a "psycho bitch." I'm pretty sure those were your words. And I understand the impulse. And now you are working with someone who clearly can make that wish come true. And here is my unsolicited advice. Do with it what you will. In light of the "buzz" that the next installment of "Monsters" is going to be the Ed Gein story, I ask you this: Please do not sign on to play Ed Gein's mother.
That is all.
Carry on.
As you were.
Ciao for now.
MWAH!
S.W.A.K.
xoxoxoxoxoxo
Chris
CFR 9/26/24