Christopher F Reidy
Christopher Reidy
  • Home
  • Blog
  • 83 In the Shade
  • Artwork
  • Videos
  • Writing
  • Contact
  • Product Information

CFR BLOG PAGE

The thoughts & Musings of Christopher F. Reidy*

NOTE: Apparently this webpage has some glitches. It tends to randomly switch out visual material.  Why?  Don't ask me.  So, if a pic doesn't match the text...it doesn't!  Rest assured I am trying to amend this problem.  When I get around to it.

*(may contain misuse of apostrophes, miss spellings, overabundance of semi-colons,  wrong word usage, etc.
Please pardon our appearance while we create a new blog experience for you!)

​ALSO: 
Please find an in-complete (or if you prefer; "ongoing") index of blog posts on the homepage, for your convenience!

AND YET ANOTHER NOTE:
The visual switcheroos on these blogs have reached a point where there's no way I can correct them all, so I'm just going to leave them be.  If they don't match the text, just think of them as whimsical funsies decorating the text.  I will continue to supply pictures; but I cannot guarantee their context: much like my mind.
Thank you for your patience!

A FURTHER NOTE:
I try to keep this website relatively free of anything truly morally reprehensible or obscene.  However, in the pursuit of honesty; I will be quite frank about sexuality; as I feel one should be.  To  wit: this website is not for children.  It is decidedly "adult"; although not necessarily not "childish."  I do not feel it is suitable, in some instances, for anyone below the age of 17.  Or maybe a very mature 16...or 15 even.  
THIS WEBSITE IS RATED: PG-15

Product Information

Revisiting Good Will Hunting (Although It Was My First Visit)

5/3/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
Contains 25 year old spoilers!

Where was I in 1997...?
Oh, yeah, I was at the tail end of my original Hollywood TRIP.  My life was kind of falling apart.  I may have been in the midst of an actual "nervous breakdown."  However, I did not have the luxury of committing myself to a mental hospital as A) I could not afford a mental hospital B) I still needed to pay rent and eat food C) I was pretty much over Los Angeles and would not have wanted to commit myself to a mental institution there; even if it was in Beverly Hills, Bel Air or even Pasadena. Canoga Park even.  I needed a reset.  I sold my belongings, got in my Tercel and headed back to The Bay State.  Danvers State Mental Hospital was mere minutes from my parent's house.  I made a mental note.
I looked back at a list of everything that was released in 1997 and I, an avid movie goer, had gone to see next to nothing at actual movie theaters. Why?  I'm not really sure. Titanic and The Full Monty were among the few.  So, when Good Will Hunting was released in early December of that year, I did not see it.  I was very much aware of it, working at So and So Productions and having all the trades at my disposal.  All those "For Your Consideration" ads and the ones trumpeting the grosses.  How the hell did Good Will Hunting manage to pull in 226 million dollars?  Robin Williams maybe?  Maybe.  Good word of mouth is more likely.
Picture
Greetings From Danvers State Mental Institute, Come, Soothe Your Mind!

In a way, I was as effed up as Will Hunting...I'll get to him later.  The reason I'm revisiting (visiting) Good Will Hunting is because it is my niece Kasey's favorite movie.  When she found out I had never seen it, she was in shock and more or less demanded that I watch it.  She wants to know my opinion of the film (she was/is certain I would love it; for how could I not?  If you're from the Boston area, it's required by law.  It's a condition to retain state residency).
So, I'll say up front, I did in fact admire/enjoy/very much like Good Will Hunting.  It was an excellent film.  I did have a few problems with it though; and in the interest of fair and balanced reporting, I will share those problems with you.  But first, the good parts.
The direction was exquisite.  Gus Van Sant was an inspired choice.  He's gay, you know!

Picture
And I think his being gay has a great deal to do with the special quality the movie has.  And its success.
Was Robin Williams gay?  No, right?  I mean he was married to three women and had three kids.  I never heard a single rumor that he might have liked dudes or experimented in college (and his roommate in college was Christopher Reeve...can you imagine?  I would've paid to see that!).  Maybe he was a gay man trapped in a straight man's body; because everything about Robin was gay.  The sensitivity. The gentleness.  The razor sharp wit.  The burning intelligence.  The outre outlook.  The fashion choices. When he was on stage he was literally light in his loafers.  Robin was wearing the rainbow flag before there even was a rainbow flag!
Picture
How often did Robin channel effeminate men and gay characterizations in his stand-up?  A lot.  It was his default-go-to.  And I think we can say he excelled at playing a gay man (see The Birdcage). But, he wasn't gay.  I would argue, however, that he was America's go-to surrogate gay man.  As Robin was "straight" it was okay for the general public to go see The Birdcage, or watch Mork and Mindy​ or whatever, right?  I think so.
So, casting Robin in GWH as the surrogate father figure was brilliant; and I think Gus Van Sant knew that.  I mean, it won Robin an Oscar.  But Van Sant was also subliminally layering in an almost(?) homoerotic element between Matt Damon and Robin Williams.  Not in a creepy way.  But I don't think we can deny that one element of the movie is a literal love story between Will and his therapist.  I mean, they have not one but two extended embraces.  The dialogue even acknowledges the sexual frisson when Robin tells Matt not to grab his ass.  But what these scenes embrace metaphorically is love between men in an honest way; something the movies almost never do.  American men can only seem to express their love for other men by getting drunk and mumbling "I love you man!"  Men are so terrified of this.  But GWH deals with it.  I think it's one of the reasons the movie resonates with so many people. It certainly resonates with my niece.  She was born the year it came out.  So, obviously she didn't see it at the cinema.  She was a month old!  The other "love" element in the film (besides the boy/girl one) is the fraternal love between the four Southie boys.  Classic ride or die male friendship; but again, this "love" too has an almost romantic element.  The entire film could be thought of as a romance: even the relationship between the camera (read: the director) and the star.  It's like the lens can't get enough of young Matt Damon.  And boy was he young!  It was one of the first things that struck me when the movie began.  He was twenty-six at the time playing twenty; but he really could have passed for sixteen.  Okay, eighteen.  Let's not make this creepy.
Picture
If you're hot and you know it, clap your hands!

Okay, maybe you kind of can't not make this part creepy.  Or should we say "creeper." Gus Van Sant specializes in "chicken."  What is "chicken" you ask?  Well, "chicken" in the gay world, generally refers to a young gay man who is the object of affection of an older man.  Gus' debut feature was about this very thing.  Even To Die For was about this very thing, except in that case the chicken was the target of a hetero woman.  Like I said, Gus specializes in it.  So, hiring him as the director, although a great choice, is also kind of a suspect one.  What was the pitch in the Miramax conference room?  "Hey, let's get Gus Van Sant!  He's great with young guys!"  Whatever the case, it turned out to be inspired.  Gus took what, in the hands of say, someone like Clint Eastwood, might've turned out to be a thudding, cliche-ridden screed on adolescent male bonding and turned it into a sort of fairy tale.  Or myth.  More on that later.  
But back to Matt.  He glows in the camera lens, appearing as nothing less than some Earthbound Eros.  Cupid with an attitude; who left his wings down in Southie.
Picture
Also, the "real-life" friendship goes a long way in the movie: the famous one between Matt & Ben; which we've all learned about since...well, Good Will Hunting.  There's no gap in the bond between the two actors.  They're actual friends since childhood.  They don't have to "act" it.  It's another element that strengthens the movie.
"The Girl" in the movie is another fantastic choice.  Minnie Driver is not the traditional beauty.  Like, this role would've usually been played by someone like, say, Gwyneth Paltrow or Denise Richards (would we have believed Denise could've gotten into Harvard, though?).  You might even say that Minnie is a tad on the masculine side; or at least androgynous. Hmmmmmm. Interesting.  But what she is, is funny and a funny girl is just the sort a guy like Will would be attracted to.  Casting her instead of some prosaic pretty girl was, again, inspired.
Picture
So, those are the things that make the movie great.
And here are some of the things, that watching it several decades removed, were not so great.
Okay, I gotta say it.  When I was watching the movie unfold, listening to the dialogue, observing the elegant story structure, I said to myself: "There's no way those two boys wrote this script by themselves.  There's just no way."
So, I did a little research.  I mean, Matt & Ben's Oscar win for Best Screenplay for GWH is now legendary, right?  But when I was researching, I had no idea that people were questioning the authorship of the movie from the day it came out.  Apparently, a lot of people had that same initial thought of "no way."  And further research revealed more doubts.  As recently as 2018, a gentleman named Bernard Cohen claims the entire idea was stolen from him by Mr. Damon.  I will reserve comment on that.  William Goldman, perhaps the finest screenwriter in the history of Hollywood, claimed that he wrote the entire movie from scratch (he then reneged on this claim; so why did he say it?).
Nothing against Matt and Ben.  I can't say whether or not they stole it and or wrote/it.  But I'd bet money there was a script doctah somewhere in Beantown that summah.
Speakin' of Bawstin accents.  I do think that they laid that on with, if not a trowel, a heavy-duty spatula.  I just came across this hilarious and on the nose SNL* clip:
Come on, Matt and Ben went to Cambridge Rindge and Latin High School and then Harvard and University of Vermont.  Hardly schools of hard knocks.  I mean have you seen the Rindge and Latin campus?  
Picture
And they laid the whole "Southie" thing on with a backhoe.  Why does this bother me?  Well, perhaps it's not really fair of me to be annoyed by two guys who went to a school like the above and went on to portray two guys of a lower socio-economic strata.  I mean, if I had seen GWH in 1997, I would've had no idea of the backgrounds of Matt & Ben.  I would've analyzed their performances at face values.  Were they convincingly playing "Southie Boys" realistically.  Yes.  And no.  And I went to high school with actual Southie boys.  One of my best friends is a Southie boy (now man) with a MENSA level intellect and a wiseassity that would make young Will look like a tyro. I mean, even back in '97, I would've had to suspend disbelief that this genius-prodigy-male-model young man would've been mopping floors at MIT.  I mean, did he not go to high school in Southie?  And if he had, no one on the school faculty recognized his brilliance and tried to shepherd him on to something other than the custodial arts?
The film starts to fall apart when you start asking questions about the character of Will and his background.  So, he's an "orphan," right?  He was severely abused by his foster father.  He now lives alone on the first floor of a Southie triple-decker.  He commutes to Cambridge from Southie.  So, how is he affording the rent on his apahtment?  On a janitor's salary?  Boston rents have never been cheap, not even in Southie in the late 90's.  If his foster father beat him with a wrench, why didn't wise-guy Will pick up a phone and drop a dime on the guy.  Foster parents have to answer to Child Services.  Will could've at least run away.  The dude wasn't his real father.  And where was his foster mother during this?  Or his foster siblings?  He has no relatives?  How and why is he an orphan?  The movie avoids all of these questions.  Ignores them.  Is that a bad thing?  Yes and no.  By making Will a sort of foundling prince, the movie turns him into a Myth.  Movies excel at mythmaking.  I would argue this tact is another of the movie's strengths.  But it takes the film out of the realm of the "gritty" reality it's supposedly trying to portray.  But, I guess the movie manages to have it both ways.
Picture
There were some other false notes.
Will tells his therapist, who teaches at Bunker Hill Community College, that the commute from Southie to Charlestown is killing him.  But the commute to MIT is no shorter.  In fact, Will would just have to change trains from the Red Line to The Orange Line at Downtown Crossing.
Also, Will is shown on the Red Line train, always in a car by himself.  Apparently the entire train to himself.  Every time he's on the train.  Now, I realize this is poetic license on the part of the director: Will is all by himself in the world.  But this has never happened in the history of Boston area public transport, especially in either the morning or at dusk, when Will is seen glowing in the light of the magic hour on said train.
Another scene that didn't sit right with me was the Southie Boys trip to Cambridge to go to a Harvard bar.  Scriptwise, this was to get them into conflict with the snotty Harvard students and a classic meet-cute between Matt and Minnie.  I mean, yeah, maybe they were "reverse slumming," but I thought the dynamics of getting them there were clunky.  It would've made much more sense if the Harvard kids were slumming in Southie, and it went down there.  Or at a dance club on Landsdowne Street or a beer joint after Fenway lets out or whatever.
​I also had a real problem with this scene, which almost destroys the entire movie:
Yes, it's a startling and powerful scene...compellingly staged, acted and filmed...but come on.  This therapist has so short a fuse that he attacks one of his patients because of verbal taunting?  A lost young kid, no less?
His license should be revoked and it seems to me that Will is just the sort who would get some payback by reporting him to The American Psychiatric Association.  But he doesn't.  Are we to take this scene as one of a bonding moment through psychotic male toxicity?  And then later in the film, when they do bond over having been abused (by their fathers); are we meant to think back on this scene and say: "Oh, it was a therapeutic tactic.  Wow, that doctor is effective!  Unorthdox, certainly, but effective!"  I don't know.  And I gotta say this too...the scene has a certain kinky under-current.  Erotic asphyxiation anyone?
Speaking of slumming, and I can only see this element of the movie by reverse osmosis; I sense a certain amount of entitled superiority in the attitudes towards education, particularly on the part of Mr. Damon, who we know attended Harvard: the institution he is herein mocking.  Or is he?
Picture
If, like me, you grew up in the greater Boston area, you've heard of Bunker Hill Community College.  Why?  Well, it's kind of a joke.  I mean, literally, the punchline of a joke.

Jimmy Sullivan: Hey Tommy, I heard you applied to B.C., B.U., and Northeastern!
Tommy Murphy: Yeah Jim, I did.  Tufts too.
Jimmy Sullivan: So'd ya get in any of 'em?
Tommy Murphy: No.  Two-hundred fahkin' dollahs down the toilet.
Jimmy Sullivan: Don't worry Tom, there's always Bunkah Hill Community (laughs, slaps Tommy on the back).

Not to deride the school; but that's simply the attitude kids have about it.  It's kind of a Masshole in-joke.  And you can't get more Massholey than Matt & Ben.  So this "joke" is front and center in the movie.  It underscores how far the Robin William's character has fallen (even though he manages to have an office the size of a classroom).  There's even a scene set in a class Williams is teaching, played for laughs.  Complete with dunder-headed students twirling their hair, chewing gum and delivering underwhelming responses.  It's kind of mean spirited.  Meanwhile, Will, who has already pointed up the arrogance and entitlement of students who go to Harvard, starts hanging out there.  The school is reverentially represented in the visuals, as Harvard usually is.  Something strikes me as hypocritical about this attitude.  It seems to me that Matt Damon, who went to Harvard, is looking down his nose at schools like BHCC and the people that teach and matriculate there.  Will is a snob then.  He works at MIT.  He couldn't have gotten a janitorial job, closer to home, like at U. Mass Boston?  He could've walked to work.
Picture
So, there's a shamrock prominently featured in the artwork for the movie (the poster, ads, etc.). Why?  Is Will Hunting Irish?  Matt Damon isn't.  Why does Will Hunting need to be Irish?  It's not specifically mentioned in the movie.  Do people just assume that everyone who lives in South Boston is Irish?  Does implying that Will is Irish make the milieu of the movie more authentic?  Why does Matt Damon, who isn't Irish, get a pass to play a person of Irish descent?  Matt is half Swedish/Finnish.  Why not the Swedish flag on the poster instead of the shamrock?  Why not call the movie Hyva Will Hunting (umlauts on the "a")?
So, it's "cultural appropriation", is it not?  The Irish must be the most culturally appropriated people on the planet.
Picture
But the thing is, the Irish don't care.  Appropriate away!  Matt can go play Saint Patrick himself (hey, there's an idea...we haven't had that movie yet!) with my blessing.  Slainte Matt!  Start working on that brogue baby!

Now, don't get me wrong.  I love Matt.  I love Ben.  Not so much as I love Matt though.  I mean, I went to see We Bought A Zoo at the movies.  I saw  The Great Wall at the movies.  I am one of the few people on the planet who can say that.  I saw The Last Duel at the movies (Matt & Ben, together again!).  One of the few Earthlings who did.  After The Last Duel  which I enjoyed, I was discussing the film with my husband.  "Isn't it great," I asked, "that Matt and Ben are at it again...acting, writing, bromancing the stone?" "Sure..." he replied.  "And didn't you love Ben's performance?"  "It was something!" "I know, right?  He actually tried some new things.  I'd daresay he was camping it up!"  Of course, Ben was nominated for a Razzie.  I'm a really bad judge of some things.  I don't know what would be worse.  Being nominated for a Razzie; or not winning the Razzie you were nominated for.  Come on Hollywood, what are you waiting for?  Why are you people not flocking to the Razzies? Do you know how many people would tune into the Razzies?  A lot.  It could be the comedy event of the season.  Mark my words: it will be a THING.  Sandy Bullock knows it!  One day people will vie for the Razzie.
Picture
Are you the blonde you became a blonde to be?**

As long as we're talking about Matt and Ben, I have a word for Matt.  Stop.  Stop working with this company immediately!
Matt, this is so off-brand for you.  It makes you seem like one of those Harvard frat bros you made fun of in Good Will Hunting.  It makes you come off like a douche.  Like, a mega-douche.  Like the douchiest douche-bro in the world.  It makes Joe Rogan seem cool.  Matt, you are not a "mere mortal."  You are a very wealthy, A-list Hollywood Movie Star and proud Masshole (note, I said "Masshole" not asshole.  This commercial makes you come off like the latter.  No one wants to hear you dis them for being a failure and not climbing a mountain.  This one makes a person question if you ever even saw Good Will Hunting, let alone wrote it).  YOU MUST STOP NOW, BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!  You must write a sequel to Good Will Hunting and pick the story up.  What happened to Will?  Is he teaching math at MIT?  Did he marry Minnie Driver?  Did he marry and is now happily residing in Southie with Stellan Skarsgard's assistant, Tom? (BTW, what was that character all about?).  Is he now a professor of psychology at Bunker Hill Community College?  THE WORLD HAS TO KNOW!  So take your paycheck from that awful commercial and get a-typin' young man!
​
​P.S. I have story ideas galore for this!  Call me at 540-520-1974.
Picture
So that's my take on Good Will Hunting.
Kasey, even though I had issues with your favorite movie, I truly liked it.  You were right.  One of my gauges for deciding what I think is a good movie is pretty simple.  Would I ever watch it again?  Pretty straightforward.  In the case of Good Will Hunting I would say "yes." Yes, I would watch it again.  And I would be at that sequel on opening night!


*(SNL? Late Night With Seth Meyers?  Same diff)
**(Actual Clairol slogan from the 1960's)

CFR 5/7/22
1 Comment
Joseph Giuliotti link
5/8/2022 07:02:14 am

Great review/analysis my friend.
A couple of things (as usual):
- Cannot believe you haven’t seen this movie until recently.
- Overall, I think the movie combines elements so well and is a textbook example of catching “lightning in a bottle“.
- Surprised you left out commentary on the musical score - especially poor Elliott Smith. His melancholic music/poetry adds weight to many of the scenes/transitions and brings a whole palette of emotional feel to the film. I think that the movie though still good, would’ve not had the same impact without it.
- Yes, you have to remember that the Hollywood “Southie Thing“ was still in its infancy at the time and GWH was one of the trendsetters. So, it was natural they appropriated it. (Also, one of the scenes cut from the film is an opening where they show the boys hanging at the (of course) SB St. Patrick’s Day Parade. Replete with slo-mo shots and overlaid (again, of course) Bagpipe music. (Re the BPs: Growing up around here, I really did not hear too many bagpipes… anywhere…except in parades Did you? “Trope, trope pretty little tropes” :-))
- Correction: Will told Lambo not Sean that the commute to MIT was killing him and wanted to move the meetings to Sean’s office in Charlestown. Also, getting to MIT is a straight shot on the red line. No crossing over on the orange line. (I think you had the BHCC and MIT locations crossed there).
- Loved the choice of Minnie Driver and loved your analysis on that.
- “Wiseassity” Stealing that.
- I suspend disbelief on the first meeting’s choking, “I will end you!” scene. Seeing that was much more gratifying than a snotty, impudent punk being allowed to roll over a guy whose been around the block and there to help. There’s something to the “playing with bull - getting the horns” philosophy that needs to be brought back and applied judiciously I think.
- Second comment on the choke scene: The HILARIOUS placement of the legendary self-help book: “I’m Ok, You’re Ok” off Will’s shoulder as he’s being throttled. Way to go Mr. Van Sant. #Genius
- I’ve never seen the CR&L campus. Wow!
- My GWH sequel will be titled: “The Takeback“ where Will gets to “California and sees about the girl” and as he predicted in the wonderfully revealing (and very moving) emotional scene in the Harvard dorm room, is dumped by Skyler who has her bluff called because she never thought Will would get the stones to leave Boston (smart girl remember). What happens to Will after that I don’t know yet but it would be mandatory for the “Harvard douche, Michael Bolton clone“ in a scene where he he and his family stop off at a fast food restaurant on the way to Lake Tahoe where Will’s the manager in charge of the drive-through customer experience . :-)

Thanks for your honesty. Glad you are in a good place today (right? :). It’s weird, my life was actually trending upward in 1997. I reached one year of sobriety (still going a day at a time), had earlier in 97 discovered and developed an immediate passion for acting where interestingly enough that, plus the impact of GWH and my increasing interest in classic films (TCM was fairly new at the time) is what eventually led me to Hollywood years later. #StrangeParallels

I enjoy your writing man. Let us know next time you are up visiting and you can slum with us Savio Massholes - Southie, Eastie…thick accents and all. :)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    August 2015

    AUTHOR
    Christopher Reidy is from the Boston area.  He attended Boston University where he studied TV and film which eventually led him to Los Angeles.  There he did the Hollywood thing (which he wasn’t particularly good at) and eventually met his partner Joseph.  He was one of the co-founders of the short lived Off Hollywood Theatre Company which staged several of his original plays.  83 In the Shade is his first novel.  He also dabbles in screenplays, toys with short stories, and flirts with poetry.  Life brought him to bucolic Southwest Virginia where he now resides and is very active in community theatre. It may interest you to know Chris is officially an Irish citizen as well as an American. He also enjoys drawing and painting and looking after a passel of 
    ​
    housecats and two turtles.